V
vonbaxterak
Registered User
- May 27, 2005
- #1
Is there a stc to install a lyc. o235-c1 in a j-3/pa-11? The type cert. says you can put the o235-c 100hp. Or can you detune the "c1" to reduce the horse power?
cubunltd
Registered User
Belle Vernon,PA
- May 28, 2005
- #2
Stay away from it. Put an 0-200 in it. 100hp with little weight gain. But that just my opinion.
John
V
vonbaxterak
Registered User
- May 28, 2005
- #3
I heard the 0-200 took higher RPM to get to 100hp. The c-90 supposedly gets better HP at lower RPM.
U
ulpilot
FRIEND
- May 29, 2005
- #4
I've been told you can take a 0200 and change it to a C90 by changing out the Cam and Lifters. Any one know if thats true?
L
Longwinglover
Registered User
Charlotte, NC
- May 29, 2005
- #5
Ulpilot,
Yes, that is essentially correct.
John Scott
Steve Pierce
BENEFACTOR
Graham, TX
- May 29, 2005
- #6
The difference in the C-90 and O-200 are the cam and valve springs. The case is also different where it attaches to the mount. There are three valve springs because of the higher rpm of the O-200. C-90 makes it's power at a lower rpm.
Alex Clark
Registered User
Life Long Alaskan
- May 29, 2005
- #7
My little PA-11-90 started out as a J3C-65.
It was wrecked in 1948 as a crop duster and stayed in a barn until the 1990s when she was totally rebuilt as a PA-11 using Atlee Dodge Stcs.
I have the C-90-8. So the plane weighs less than 800 empty. But I have no electrical. I land and take off in 300 feet with two folks and 18 gallons on board.
Back when I was flying a no-flap 125hp PA-12, there was a guy with a 115 horse converted J-3/PA-11 and he had flaps. He was always cutting it close on his gross weight, but he could take-off about the same as I could without flaps. About 350 to 400 feet.
The J-3 /PA-11 series need to be kept light or they dont work so great. Their tubing is lighter and further apart so they really don't like big heavy things hung on them.
Gordon Misch
MEMBER
Toledo, Wa (KTDO)
- May 29, 2005
- #8
A friend of mine in Juneau had a C-90 J3 that was very light - and it could really get off the ground. Try as I might, I couldn't beat him off the beach with my PA12-150 with flaps, even after throwing the rear seat cushions and everything else out on the sand! He couldn't beat me either though - it was a frustrating draw - trial after trial! But with a passenger in back, the picture changed completely - - For short and soft field, nothing, but nothing matters as much as weight, I think! As I look back on it, he always flew solo from the front seat, and I bet if he were in back and optimally trimmed he could have got off even shorter.
My 12 was pretty nose-heavy, I bet it would have done better driving from the back too! Has anybody experimented with take-off distance or cruise speed soloing from the back of a 12-150 with standard length engine mount?
Alex Clark
Registered User
Life Long Alaskan
- May 30, 2005
- #9
You would cruise faster with an aft CG due to the change in angle of attack on the wing.
But, I wonder about taking off. If your tail is light is comes up faster and that reduces the drag from the first part of the take-off run. Then you swing it back down (nose up) for rotation. So having a light tail might be better. But on landing having a heavy tail helps you stick the landing and stop faster.
Gordon Misch
MEMBER
Toledo, Wa (KTDO)
- May 30, 2005
- #10
Aft loaded reduces the down pressure required by the horiz stabilizer, which should reduce drag, and additionally increase the NET lift on the aircraft at any given lift condition of the wing?
JoeW
Registered User
Cleveland, OH
- May 30, 2005
- #11
J-3 w/235
Yes,
there is an STC for a J-3 with a O-235 C1 115 HP. I have one. It was done back in the sixties though. The engine mount is a PA-18, it has a gallon header tank similar to a PA-18 and 1 18 gallon wing tank in the left wing. I had taken all the electrics off. My EW is in the upper 700's. I can solo from front or rear. Flies great. However I only get about 2.5 hours flight time per tank. The plane is similar to the PA-18 105 Special now.
I'll see if I can find the STC number on the 337.
Joe
cruiser
Registered User
South Glens Falls, NY
- May 30, 2005
- #12
Are there any rules in regard to how much usable fuel per HP must be carried? Jim
You must log in or register to reply here.